Category: General

How Might Opinion Polls Negatively Affect Voter behaviors?

Opinion polls can be defined as a method of collecting and gathering information about the views and beliefs of a group of people. Opinion polls are designed to represent the sentiments of a group by carrying out a series of questions and generalizing in ratio or within confidence intervals. The information gotten from opinion polls can be used to shed light on and allow conclusions to be drawn about certain characteristics of a larger population. Political opinion polls, therefore, mean the standardized series of political questions that are asked and analyzed to draw a conclusion on the topic and have an idea of the view of the public.

Voter behavior on the other hand is a form of electoral behavior. Voting behavior in simple terms is the different ways in which people tend to vote. Voter behavior can explain why certain decisions were made by the public decision-makers and how these decisions come about. Voter behavior has been a source of concern for political scientists, politicians, and the electoral body.

Opinion polls become an important part of analyzing voter behavior as they can help to understand why people make their political decisions such as why they vote for different political parties. Voting behavior is not only limited to opinion polls. It can also be a result of long and short-term influences including social class, gender, race, culture, religion, housing, governing party, the image of the party leaders, war or economic crises, and so on.

Quite a number of opinion polls are published during election campaigns. The influence of opinion polls on the behavior & decisions of the voter is a complicated matter. This is owing to the fact that the accuracy of the polls has been questioned and is now a subject of contentious debate.

While political opinion polls are not the exact reflection of the public’s opinions it does not mean that it has no effect on the decision-making process of the voters.

Political opinion polls can negatively affect voters’ behavior because it is capable of swaying voters’ opinions on some issues, it can also motivate them not to vote, voters’ views on candidates can also be influenced and the polls can persuade people to view particular issues and candidates.  

 Different variables at work can negatively affect the process of an election. There are two types of effects when it comes to political opinion polls which are contagion and bandwagon effects. 

The bandwagon effect

The bandwagon effect is regarded as the situation where voters who think a particular political party will win end up switching their votes for that party or candidate during elections. It can also be argued that despite inclining who will win the election, voters might not change their votes. The impression of the social and media environments on who is going to win the election is a greater influence on the bandwagon effect. To eliminate this effect, countries like India and Australia have laws regulating political polls during elections because of the fear that political opinion polls during active elections can tilt the democratic process.

The Contagion Effect

The Contagion effect and strategic voting are intertwined. Strategic voting is a form of voting effect that is motivated by the intention of the voters to affect which party and candidates will win the election. Contagion is the move of voters to the view of the perceived majority. Voters are known to switch sides to feel accepted and a part of the winning team. Voters also search for the wisdom of the crowd when they analyze poll results because they value the opinion of experts more than that of their peers.

Our Picks for Funniest Comedians

white the Comedy Store neon signage

Suppose you used to think the best type of comedy was an earnest, thought-provoking drama in which a bunch of high-powered actors delivers Oscar-worthy performances while depicting what it’s like to grow up African American in 20th century California or some such thing. In that case, you need to get reacquainted with funny. So for this post, we wanted to share a few of our favorite comedians with you.

This list is in no particular order.

Louis C.K

Louis C.K.’s humor is wide-ranging and edgy, and he doesn’t let anyone get away with it.

That has led him to be a controversial figure among comedy fans, many of whom have criticized his material, saying it’s offensive, sexist, and homophobic.

But just because Louis C.K.’s humor is unusual doesn’t mean it’s not funny.

People who don’t like it are probably not his target audience.

Louis C.K.’s comedy is perfect for a particular audience — people who don’t like the typical comedy on offer.

Trevor Noah

The greatest comedian of his era, Trevor Noah, is the most sought-after comic in the world. The Daily Show with Trevor Noah has become the hottest show late-night. Noah himself has emerged as one of the most brilliant, original, and hilarious standups working today.

Noah first burst onto the scene in his native South Africa, where he hosted his late-night talk show, Trevor Noah’s Daily Show, on Comedy Central. The Daily Show with Trevor Noah quickly attracted a huge following. Noah was named one of Variety’s 10 Comics to Watch in 2013. His debut standup special, Trevor Noah: Lost in Translation, received rave reviews and was named one of the 10 Best Standups of 2013 by Time Magazine. Noah has since continued to build on his rapid success, touring the world and selling out shows at Hollywood’s iconic Laugh Factory while receiving countless standing ovations. Noah’s comedy is distinctly South African — raw, politically incorrect, and brutally honest, but with a universal appeal. His stories always deal with identity, politics, and the absurdities of everyday life.

Sarah Silverman

Sarah Silverman, the comedian who famously said, “I like making people laugh. It’s a great way to get them to open up and feel comfortable,” has a fairly impressive resume. She won a Daytime Emmy Award for Outstanding Performer in a Children’s Special at age 13. She started on Saturday Night Live, where she shared the stage with Tina Fey and Amy Poehler. Silverman’s comedy about sex, gender, and politics has always been frank and unapologetic, and it’s made her one of the most outspoken comics of her generation.

Kevin Hart

In the ten years since Hart exploded onto the comedy scene, he’s been compared to everyone from Eddie Murphy to Steve Harvey to Richard Pryor. But none of those comparisons capture what makes him so uniquely hilarious. Hart’s comedy comes from his genuineness. Many of the jokes in his act are subtle, clever, and self-deprecating. They reflect his comfortable, easy-on-the-eyes persona — a 6-foot-tall, 225-pound black man with buttery-smooth skin, broad shoulders, and slicked-back hair. That’s not to say that Hart gives his comedy a “big brother” vibe. He’s not some meek, submissive character who’s always apologizing for being who he is. Instead, Hart’s comedy reflects his confidence, his self-assuredness, and his refusal to ever apologize for who he is. With a laugh like that, it’s no wonder that he’s become one of the most successful comedians of his generation. But it’s not just Hart’s comedy that’s made him so successful. He’s also become one of the most bankable actors in Hollywood, even though his claim to fame isn’t acting but his comedy.

Conclusion

If you are looking to laugh until you cry or laugh until you pee your pants, the comedian list below should have the perfect comedian for you. From comedians like Louis C.K, Trevor Noah, Sarah Silverman, and Kevin Hart, you can be assured these comedians will have you laughing hard.

Why Mental Health Should Not Be Taught in Schools

boy in black hoodie sitting on chair

I am of the opinion that Mental health should not be taught in schools. This is not an ‘anti-psychiatry statement or an attempt to persuade you not to seek psychiatric help. It’s simply a reflection that responsibility for mental health is best placed with the recipient. This responsibility does not extend to relieving patients of their freedom, which will ultimately be theirs only if they are mentally competent.

It seems evident that people without good mental health can’t do as good a job at their jobs as people with healthy minds. But it’s far from obvious why. If doctors had known that depression causes so many physical problems, they would have paid more attention to it before it became fashionable to ignore it. The correlation between mental and physical health is too vague to be predictable. That means it’s not something schools can teach. In medicine, you can’t tell a patient’s symptoms from her diagnosis. The only reliable way of predicting whether a patient will respond well to treatment is to ask her. However, many doctors are so focused on getting the diagnosis right that they don’t ask about the problem. Schools don’t have the luxury of asking. If they did, they might find that people’s mental problems stem not just from a lack of medication but a mismatch between their jobs and their abilities. If schools could work out what people need, then they could teach them that. But they can’t because diagnosing mental problems is difficult.

Most teachers aren’t trained to do therapy. The great majority of teachers are not trained to do therapy. A therapist must be trained in various ways, including introductory psychology, effective communication, listening to and understanding others, and an ability to empathize. Most teachers, however, usually need help to do some of these things.

Teachers are first and foremost observers. They observe students’ behavior and reactions, and then they interpret those reactions. Teachers are not trained to make inferences about people’s inner lives. Thus, when a student seems to have a problem, the teacher often assumes that the student knows and feels what the teacher thinks the student knows and feels. Because of that, teachers often don’t recognize when a student is hurt or upset. Even experienced teachers sometimes seem surprised when a student comes up to them and says, “I feel foolish, and I don’t know why.”

Once a student finally tells a teacher what the teacher thought the student was feeling, the teacher usually feels relieved. With luck, the teacher will then say, “Oh, that’s okay. Let’s go sit somewhere and talk.” But the teacher doesn’t usually say, “Don’t be silly. Don’t you know why you feel stupid? Because you don’t understand.”

Conclusion:

Mental health shouldn’t be taught in schools, but it’s commendable that schools explore ways to help students’ mental health.

However, it’s not their place to teach mental health any more than to teach chemistry or music. The most valuable education we can offer our children is to teach them how to reason, how to think critically, how to understand people and situations, how to communicate effectively, how to explore ideas, and how to express themselves.

Mental health are personal matter and should be treated as such. Suppose students are genuinely interested in learning how to improve their emotional well-being and mental strength. In that case, it’s a good thing to explore. But schools shouldn’t be teaching it. Instead, schools should focus on teaching skills that can be readily applied to life, whether you’re on a sales call or dealing with a demanding customer.

That said, schools could offer mental health courses for interested students or offer extracurricular programs that focus on developing emotional well-being. These aren’t just feel-good classes, either. Properly developed, they can help children develop resilience, empathy, and problem-solving skills, which are valuable in business.

But students should be the ones to choose whether they want to participate, and teachers should respect their choices. And, of course, if a student is struggling with mental health issues, involving them in such programs could be counterproductive. However, suppose any school truly wants to help students develop their skills to lead happy, productive lives. In that case, it should be offering mental health classes.

Why Avoid Taking Vitamin C at Night

orange fruit with white round fruits

Introduction

There are many vitamins and you will find on the internet alongside their uses. One vitamin, in particular: Vitamin C. This vitamin is touted for its ability to help build your immune system and assist promote better health, among many other benefits. Vitamin C is great when taken in the proper doses at the appropriate times. However, taking Vitamin C at night can cause serious side effects that may do more harm than good. This article you are about to read is a brief guide on why you avoid taking vitamin C at night.

One of the big questions in nutrition is whether taking vitamin C at night is more effective than taking it during the day. Vitamin C is the most widely taken supplements around the world. Taking vitamin C supplements in the morning can strengthen your immune system. However, the same study that tells us that vitamin C supplements can help strengthen your immune system also tells us that taking vitamin C supplements at night can have the opposite effect.

In one study of 1,100 people, researchers gave one group 500 mg of vitamin C twice a day and another group the same amount of vitamin C supplements at night. The researchers found that people taking vitamin C supplements at night had a 75 percent lower immune system than those who took vitamin C supplements in the morning.

What’s more, people who took vitamin C supplements at night had higher levels of vitamin C in their saliva than those who took them in the morning. That’s because people who took vitamin C supplements at night had less of an enzyme called carboxylesterase, which breaks down vitamin C into inactive forms.

The researchers suggested that vitamin C supplements at night might be less effective than vitamin C supplements in the morning.

Vitamin C supplements only contain a small amount of vitamin C, so taking large amounts can have side effects. For example, vitamin C supplements might cause diarrhea, constipation, nausea, stomach pain, and heartburn. If you’re taking a multivitamin that contains vitamin C, you need to take a vitamin C supplement separately. Take vitamin C supplements at night. Your body may break down vitamin C more efficiently, so you might end up taking more vitamin C than you would if you take them in the morning. Taking vitamin C supplements at night might also increase your risk of kidney stones.

Several studies show that taking vitamin C supplements at night may lower the amount of melatonin in the body in the morning. Melatonin helps regulate your sleep-wake cycle.

Melatonin is a hormone secreted primarily in the brain. It promotes sleep and also suppresses the secretion of the hormone cortisol. The hormone Cortisol is released by the adrenal glands in response to stress and can disrupt sleep. Melatonin is known to play a significant role in sleep and wakefulness. It affects the activity of several parts of the brain.

Conclusion

Avoid taking vitamin C at night. Vitamin C is a water-soluble vitamin, so, just like water, your body can flush it out. Your body needs to flush out the vitamin C to absorb it.

Flushing out vitamin C at night leaves you without that extra vitamin C that you would have acquired during the day. And, you miss out on the vitamin C that your body makes from foods you eat during the day.

Our Thoughts on Brexit

Hello there. Today I will be talking about how we all feel about Brexit. But do you even know what Brexit means? If you don’t, we will help you with some explanations here and there. Relax and watch us explain all you need to know about Brexit and learn some of our thoughts on it too.

What is Brexit? 

Well, Brexit is a portmanteau or a merge between the words British and Exit. It was from the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the EU (European Union) around eleven am on the 31st of January 2020 GMT. The first and one of the only nations left the European Union after around forty-seven years. It has also been one of the member states of the European Union and then from its predecessor. The European Communities (EC), since the 1st of January 1973. Looking at the terms from the Brexit Agreement for its withdrawal, various Northern Ireland keep participating in the European Single Market and its high relation to goods. For it to remain a de facto member of the EU Customs Union. 

Our Thoughts now on Brexit 

The European Union and its institutions have gently gradually developed since their establishment, which included forty-seven years of membership with Britain. Then it grew to be essential to the United Kingdom. Though around that time, various Eurosceptic groups existed. There were also opposing aspects from the union, which had a variety of predecessors. 

The prime Minister known as Harold Wilson has his government hold a referendum that ran as an EC membership in the year 1975. Here some voters decided to stay and remain within the bloc of around sixty-seven point two percent of the stare of votes. No other referendums were held as the entire project kept on growing, and then it became very close in subsequent Lisbon and Maastricht treaties. As part of a pledge for the campaign, which was available to win votes from Eurosceptic, David Cameron, the Prime Minister, promised to hold a significant referendum if their government ended up being re-elected. His Pro-EU government ended up holding another referendum that kept on being part of the EU membership from 2016. Here, voters decided to forget about the European Union, which had around fifty-one point nine percent share of the votes. 

We still wonder what would have made members of Britain exit from one part of the world to the next. Like having a Queen and a prime minister was not good enough for them. The portmanteau Brexit still needed to get created, and then the United Kingdom left the European Union. Some people feel nations in the European union are bonded by their geographic location. But it seems nations like the United Kingdom can easily opt-out when things go in proportions the United Kingdom does not find favorable. Here’s to hoping nothing negative occurs. And if negative wants to come, the positive impact must always be what would occur in the end. As is said, if it isn’t better it isn’t the end yet. 

Liposomal vs. Regular Vitamin C

orange fruit with white round fruits

Hey there. Today I would be playing a Vs. Game. You know, Vs. Like the way, it is done on Mortal Kombat. But it would be about Liposomal vs. Regular Vitamin C. I would explain Liposomal and give some small explanation about vitamin c (which I am sure you already know long before now), and then you would pick the winner of this vs. match. Are we ready? FIGHT!. 

What you need to know about Liposomal 

Liposomal is a type of blister that has at least a single bilayer. The liposome could be used as a vehicle to deliver drugs and administer drugs from pharmacies and nutrients. These nutrients and drugs from pharmacies included lipid nanoparticles available in mRNA vaccines and those available in DNA vaccines. Liposomes could be created after biological membranes have been disrupted. 

Because these liposomes are absorbed by the body faster, including the intestines, people never feel the loose stool side effects from traditional forms of supplementation. This is a huge plus on its own. Apart from the fact that there is a high amount of hydro chloric acid in the stomach, liposomal still works and helps in digestion. 

All you need to know about Vitamin C 

We are sure you already know the primary forms of vitamin C mix you prefer sodium ascorbate, calcium ascorbate, or ascorbic acid. You would enjoy vitamin C. Vitamin C comes in either capsule form or tablet form. 

Liposomal Vs Vitamin C 

The issue obtained from traditional forms of vitamin c is that it affects some groups of people negatively. Some people experience this type of complaint where they suffer from stomach issues like hyperacidity or loose stool. 

But this does not occur with liposomes because they get adequately absorbed by the body.

My thoughts on Liposomal vs. Regular Vitamin C

Growing up, all my life, I have been consuming local traditional Vitamin C. I grew up to be a handsome fine young man, if I say so myself. And I grew up taking vitamin C. But the reason I would go with Liposomal on which is better, is that there are people who consume vitamin C, and they end up suffering from diarrhea because their system does not like the form they are taking it. This means some people do not enjoy vitamin C being in capsules or tablets. These types of people would prefer Liposomal any day, anytime.

And another reason why I would go with Liposomal is that Liposomal could be used when one wants to take any drug. Besides the vitamin and minerals that vitamin C has, an association of other types could be taken in with Liposomal. People could easily enjoy the consumption of drugs and nutrients from pharmacies where lipid nanoparticles are available from mRNA vaccines and those which are also available from DNA vaccines. These liposomes could easily be created after biological membranes have gotten disrupted. 

So at the end of this Mortal Kombat match between Liposomal and Regular Vitamin C, Liposomal wins fair and square.

Should You Wear a Mask?: Pros and Cons Since the Delta Variant Has Spiked COVID Cases (and How to Stay Healthy).

girl in pink tank top with green mask

The states are reopening after the long period of lockdown, and many, this includes California, are presently wearing a face mask in public spaces to reduce COVID 19, this has turn to a necessity. The Center for Disease Control and Prevention and the World health organization (WHO) has stated that the citizens are free to use masks made of cloths for public use unlike when the pandemic started and they said that we should wear the medical face mask which is so opposite of what we are recommended today. These orders from the organization have somehow caused confusion towards the citizens about the wearing of face masks. Health officials have confirmed the face masks aid in preventing the spread of COVID 19 and the more the practice of wearing face masks happen, the safer we will be from getting the virus.

An interview was conducted in San Francisco, an epidemiologist called George Rutherford, and an infectious disease specialist Peter Chin Hong. Questions was asked on the Center of Disease Control and Prevention masks changing ideas and what to have in mind while getting a mask. When they were asked why the sudden change from CDC. Mr. Rutherford said that the supply of surgical masks and N95 respirators can be reserved for medical personnel to prevent them from being infected and treat others. Another thing is that the United States does not want to wear masks unlike some countries in Asia it is like their normal lifestyle. Some people from the United States still choose to ignore the information that is given by CDC.

What is the effectiveness of the face mask?

There are different forms to prove that the mask is effective. One of them is that the masks have been taken to the laboratory and it has been studied that the respiratory droplets from our noses and mouth can be blocked by the face masks. This was done by looking through a high-speed video that showed that droplets from about 20 to 500 micrometers are gotten while coughing but the droplets decrease as a cloth was placed in front of the mouth. Another experiment showed that people that had the flu or cold reduce the spread of their virus when they wore masks from reducing the number of droplets that spread out.

But there is no better evidence than real-life research and experiences. The epidemiologic data mentioned how the results of wearing a face mask can lead to. Columbia and 15 states did a before and after comparison on the effectiveness of face masks. And it was showed that indeed the spread of COVID 19 reduce at a surprising rate, with a daily reduction of 0.9 percent.

Who should wear a face mask?

Everyone should wear a face mask, but sadly it can’t be so because when you expect 100 people to wear a face mask it’s only like 80 people will wear it. We should all wear our masks and do the necessary precautions to reduce the spread of the virus.

Our Thoughts on Gun Control Laws in America

This piece would simply be talking about what we think about the laws placed in the United States of America on using guns and its control. 

What are Our Thoughts on Gun Control Laws in America

Our Thoughts includes the following;

Is there an age that someone might not make use of these guns? 

The gun control act of the year 1968 regulated firearms at the federal level. This required legal residents and citizens who need to be at least eighteen years of age to buy rifles or shotguns and various forms of ammunition. 

All other types of firearms like handguns could be sold to only people that are twenty-one years of age or older. 

Local officials and state officials might implement a higher restriction of age but might not be allowed to reduce the federal minimum. 

Who cannot go and purchase guns or various other firearms?

People who are fugitives or those deemed dangerous to society and people who have suffered from mental illnesses are among those who shouldn’t purchase these firearms. People who have felonies in their criminal record or those with prison sentences that pass a year or a misdemeanour that carries these sentences of a time that’s higher than two years should not be allowed to purchase firearms and guns. 

Some federal rules and regulations block the sales of guns to individuals who have been found guilty of possessing guns unlawfully or using controlled drug substances all through the previous year. This includes drugs like marijuana through various United States regions. These are also illegal under federal law. 

People that have restraining orders by courts not to harass other people or threaten or stalk them cannot purchase these guns. Members of the army that were dishonourably discharged and migrants that were not authorized cannot purchase guns. 

Do the state or federal government regulate the purchase of these firearms? 

The second amendment serves as the basis legally for the right of citizens to bear and keep arms. 

Though the local and state governments regulate residents might, for example, make use of guns in public, several laws regulate people that might possess or receive guns. These are set out at the federal levels of the state. 

Our Thoughts on Gun Control Laws in America

Well, we feel the law is proper, and it is on our side. But the problem is, who and who can’t we use this gun against. Think about what happened to George Floyd. If he has his gun that day, the story would have been entirely different. We advise you to watch this short movie “Two Distant Strangers” would you have liked someone who is Black to carry a gun and start shooting white cops? What would the news say? How would the courts view all of these? It is a lot of things. The only thing we want concerning these gun control laws is peace, equity, equality. No more, no less. 

Why is Stem Cell Research Controversial?

Hello there. Today I’ll be talking about the reasons Stem Cell Research seems controversial. There are embryonic stem cell lines from the year 2001 from president Bush held a firm pro-life view. This allowed various federal national institutions for health to fund these stem cell research using embryonic stem cells to these were already in existence at the period. This prohibited the funding from NIH for the derivation or use of more embryonic stem cell lines. These policies were responses to growing senses which hESC studies held a high amount of promise to treat and understand degenerative diseases. This still opposed more destruction of human embryos. It results from the destruction of these human embryos that made this research in Stem cells controversial. A variety of researchers viewed the funding from NIH as something essential to attract scientists to make a very long-termed commitment that would study all of the basic biologies of stem cells. Without making any decisive science platform breakthrough that might be likely to get used. 

What did the Old President Bush say about this Stem Cells Research? 

The rationale for this policy was that the embryos created from these lines and produced were already destroyed. This allowed various research to get carried out on these stem celled lines. These might allow a lot of good to come out from their destruction. Making use of only embryonic stem cell lines, which were embryonic and existed, was problematic scientifically. Usually, the NIH knew that over sixty hESC lines were accepted for the NIH funding. As surprising as that might be, a lot of these lines weren’t quite suitable to be used for research. For instance, they weren’t firm enough to grow into more than a single cell. They ended up being contaminated, and they couldn’t be shipped to other parts of the world anymore. From the first month of 2009, these hESC lines were quite enough to get funding from NIH. But these lines weren’t safe to get transplanted into people. There were very long lines standing, and it was observed that they could gather and accumulate various forms of mutations. These mutations included different types that were already predisposed to have traits of cancer. 

Adding to all of these, some concerns were raised about the process of consent on the levels of the derivation of these different NIH lines that were approved. The majority of these scientific experts included the Director of the NIH, who was under President George Bush. He believed that an absence of a brand new embryonic stem cell line would hinder necessary progress toward the transplantation of stem cells. 

My thoughts on why Stem Cell Research is Controversial 

Well, different people have different thoughts on this specific topic. It is pretty controversial because these stemmed cells cannot be transplanted and used by people. Maybe when that happens, it would get accepted by members of the world faster and with a reduced amount of controversy. 

How Magnesium Helps Balance Your Mood

Different people have a variety of different mood swings. A lot of things might be stressing them or causing them to suffer headaches and all. Today I’m here to tell you that magnesium can help your mood the appropriate balance it needs. Let’s ride on, shall we? 

What are the ways Magnesium Impacts and Balances your Mood? 

In 2016, the national institute of mental health concluded that around sixteen point two million adult Americans suffered from an episode of severe depression. 

What is an Episode of depression, and how does magnesium Help? 

An episode of severe depression refers to depression that lasts about two weeks. The person has a complete loss of interest in anything, and they are in a mood of depression and about four other symptoms that change their ability to function the way they usually do. 

Various other symptoms include sleeping, not being energetic, having low self-esteem, loss of appetite, being suicidal, loss of concentration or loss of trains of thoughts. This could end up in death.

People that suffer from depression coops suffer various physical symptoms. These symptoms include depression that could get complicated, back pain, general headaches and migraines, premenstrual syndromes, and check pains, including anxiety attacks, muscle aches, joint pain, digestive issues, exhaustion, and fatigue

We all know that depression is indeed a complex thing. Various experts genuinely believe that it results from the combination of differences biologically, hormonal play, inherited traits and the chemistry of the brain, which ends up gathering and making someone depressed. There are also various external factors too like your surrounding environments. 

What are the Benefits of Magnesium for people who are Depressed? 

Magnesium Helps people by acting on their hormones. 

Having hormonal balance is extremely important for your overall well-being and your mood. The mineral magnesium plays an essential role in the regulation of various levels of cortisol. This prevents a Very high amount of production of cortisol. Cortisol aids in calming our nervous system. Because stress must occur no matter what, this triggers the entire body to release higher amounts of cortisol. This keeps our nervous system calm, and it permanently reduces the high amount of stress we are suffering from. Balancing this hormone ends up playing roles in maintaining follicles, estrogens, luteinizing hormones, testosterone and the follicle-stimulating hormone in our bodies. 

Hormones like those from the thyroid gland can contribute to you having depressive symptoms and having bad moods when it is not active. Magnesium assists in the production of the thyroid hormone. This also provides several benefits of protection to the thyroid gland when reducing its anti-inflammatory properties. 

So there we have it. Now you understand the methods Magnesium uses to balancing our moods. Whenever you feel off or down, try to consume something that has magnesium as one of its ingredients. Before you know it, you’ll rapidly feel the boost of energy, peace, freedom, happiness, and you’ll go back to your sharp, witty old self.